FinTelegram’s Malina Casino review exposes a geo-domain payment-rail layer targeting EU players through jurisdiction-specific deposit routes. Austrian and Italian test flows revealed Revolut Open Banking, Perspecteev SAS, RAPID, Finmesh, Skrill, MiFinity, ChainValley-style fake-FIAT crypto conversion, Zentoria, and the newly surfaced mixfind.com payee. The evidence points to a classic offshore casino rail model: the casino brand stays in the front window, while rotating payment facilitators, payees, gateways and open-banking actors move the money underneath.
FinTelegram’s ongoing Rail Atlas investigation has identified a recurring pattern behind offshore casino payments targeting EU users: anonymous gateway layers route transactions into regulated Open Banking providers—including Yapily, Perspecteev (SaltEdge ecosystem), and now Powens—before reaching bank endpoints such as Revolut.
FinTelegram’s Rail Atlas analysis have repeatedly observed Revolut’s Open Banking endpoint inside layered offshore casino payment flows. The pattern appears to combine anonymous gateways, open-banking intermediaries, and Revolut’s own customer-side payment infrastructure. This does not prove knowing facilitation by Revolut — but it raises serious questions about monitoring and merchant transparency,
A growing body of indicators suggests that a cluster of outwardly separate online casino brands may be linked, directly or indirectly, to Zentoria Limited and a shared backend payments architecture. FinTelegram reviewed operator attributions, Irish licensing records, repeated payee clues, and live payment flows across multiple brands. The result is not yet a final legal attribution of the full network, but the hypothesis of a Zentoria-linked casino cluster has become increasingly plausible.
A player communication reviewed by FinTelegram raises a serious compliance question for Revolut: did the fintech initially tell a customer that Mastercard chargebacks had been raised and finally decided, only to later admit that no chargebacks had been submitted at all? Against the backdrop of FinTelegram’s long-running investigations into illegal offshore casino payment rails, the case sharpens a broader issue.
A new FinTelegram Rail Atlas analysis shows Perspecteev SAS, the French payment institution behind the Bridge brand, appearing in deposit flows linked to offshore casino brands targeting German users — with opaque gateway labels such as “SaferSEPA” sitting between the casino front end and the regulated payment-initiation layer.
Recent whistleblower reports and online investigative publications in January 2026 allege that SoftSwiss, through its Malta-licensed entity Stable Aggregator Limited (MGA/B2B/942/2022), operates as an unlicensed payment hub and money laundering facilitator for affiliated casino operators targeting prohibited jurisdictions. The allegations assert that SoftSwiss processes payments from unlicensed merchants.
PlatinCasino is an offshore casino without regulatory permission in the UK or the EU. Its cashier labels a deposit option “Sofort,” but our testing indicates a very different mechanism: an open-banking style bank-selection and authorization flow via secure.bankgate.io, leading into a user’s bank (e.g., Revolut) to approve a third party.
FinTelegram’s deposit-flow tests at PlatinCasino (platincasino.com) show a deliberately confusing payments stack: “bank transfers” that actually buy stablecoins and push them to wallets, plus “Sofort”/open-banking flows that route users through EU-regulated fintech rails. The result: an offshore casino can collect player funds across Europe while keeping onboarding friction—and KYC prompts—remarkably low.