FinTelegram’s Rail Atlas analysis have repeatedly observed Revolut’s Open Banking endpoint inside layered offshore casino payment flows. The pattern appears to combine anonymous gateways, open-banking intermediaries, and Revolut’s own customer-side payment infrastructure. This does not prove knowing facilitation by Revolut — but it raises serious questions about monitoring and merchant transparency,
A growing body of indicators suggests that a cluster of outwardly separate online casino brands may be linked, directly or indirectly, to Zentoria Limited and a shared backend payments architecture. FinTelegram reviewed operator attributions, Irish licensing records, repeated payee clues, and live payment flows across multiple brands. The result is not yet a final legal attribution of the full network, but the hypothesis of a Zentoria-linked casino cluster has become increasingly plausible.
PlatinCasino is an offshore casino without regulatory permission in the UK or the EU. Its cashier labels a deposit option “Sofort,” but our testing indicates a very different mechanism: an open-banking style bank-selection and authorization flow via secure.bankgate.io, leading into a user’s bank (e.g., Revolut) to approve a third party.
Our PlatinCasino review indicates that the casino’s “Sofort” deposit option is not Klarna’s Sofort in the traditional sense, but a bank-to-bank open-banking rail that runs through secure.bankgate.io, a gateway branded to SALTEDGE (Salt Edge Limited). The flow redirects users into Revolut’s Open Banking authorization.
FinTelegram’s deposit-flow tests at PlatinCasino (platincasino.com) show a deliberately confusing payments stack: “bank transfers” that actually buy stablecoins and push them to wallets, plus “Sofort”/open-banking flows that route users through EU-regulated fintech rails. The result: an offshore casino can collect player funds across Europe while keeping onboarding friction—and KYC prompts—remarkably low.