Tag: yapily

Passpoint markets itself as a financial orchestration platform for Africa, Europe, and G20 payment corridors. But FinTelegram’s Betify review found something far more problematic: Passpoint Sp. z o.o., its Polish entity, appeared as the named payee in an open-banking/bank-transfer rail used to fund Betify, an offshore casino accessible from EU jurisdictions. This is not a passive API footprint.

FinTelegram’s May 2026 review of Betify shows a materially reconfigured payment architecture compared with the August 2024 review. The visible corporate wrapper has changed from Altacore N.V. / Altaprime Limited to Fortuna Games N.V. / Deltaprime Limited, but the underlying risk pattern remains: EU players can apparently access and fund an offshore casino through layered payment rails.

FinTelegram’s Rail Atlas review of 1Go Casino identified CAPITOLIO INC. as the visible payee in a Revolut/Yapily open-banking casino deposit flow. Capitolio presents itself as a Canadian MSB offering open-banking, fiat-to-crypto, payout, and gaming/digital-economy infrastructure — raising urgent questions about its role as a collection entity for offshore casino payments.

FinTelegram’s latest Revolut Rail Atlas review of 1Go Casino shows how a player-facing offshore casino cashier can route deposits through a multi-layered payment stack before reaching a regulated open-banking interface. In the tested Revolut flow, the user journey moved from 1Go Casino through BillBlend, SegoPay, Tryzto, InstantBankPayment, Yapily Connect UAB, and finally oba.revolut.com, where the user was asked to authorise Yapily Connect UAB.

FinTelegram’s ongoing Rail Atlas investigation has identified a recurring pattern behind offshore casino payments targeting EU users: anonymous gateway layers route transactions into regulated Open Banking providers—including Yapily, Perspecteev (SaltEdge ecosystem), and now Powens—before reaching bank endpoints such as Revolut.

FinTelegram’s Rail Atlas investigation into casino payment flows has taken a new turn. What began with alleged threats against a player has evolved into a pattern: intimidation, followed by silence, and accompanied by public mockery. With no response to formal inquiries but sarcastic engagement on LinkedIn, Impaya’s handling of the situation raises serious questions about compliance culture, accountability, and its role in high-risk payment infrastructures.

Instead of answering serious compliance questions, Impaya’s CEO Sergejs Roslikovs responded to FinTelegram’s investigation with sarcasm on LinkedIn — “Thanks for the advertisement :)”. His COO joined the tone, celebrating the attention. Meanwhile, Impaya has not answered FinTelegram’s formal inquiry.

As FinTelegram expands its Rail Atlas investigation into offshore casino payment flows, a new element has emerged: alleged threats by Impaya against a player who raised compliance concerns. Screenshots and video evidence reviewed by FinTelegram show aggressive language, legal threats, and mockery — including emojis — instead of a structured response.

FinTelegram has reviewed a whistleblower report indicating that Germany’s financial watchdog BaFin has registered a case concerning Yapily Connect UAB, the Lithuanian licensed arm of the UK open-banking group Yapily. The allegations are explosive: regulated Pay by Bank infrastructure was allegedly used to process deposits for offshore casino brands targeting German players.

FinTelegram’s review of GoldenBet shows a diversified payment architecture around the Santeda Group: card deposits evidenced through Payabl, wallet deposits showing Santeda International Limited as beneficiary via MiFinity, and an Open Banking rail through Bilderlings → Yapily Connect → Revolut’s Open Banking API. This is no longer a single-PSP complaint story. It is a Rail Atlas case study in how offshore casino operators maintain EU-facing payment continuity

Whistleblower evidence reviewed by FinTelegram indicates that casino deposits may pass through a layered redirect chain before reaching the Paysolo open-banking gateway. The observed flow — Pagagate → Impaya.online → Aceiro.online → openbanking.paysolo.net — suggests that Impaya and Aceiro may function as intermediate routing or masking layers between casino-facing payment gateways and the open-banking execution stack involving Paysolo, Pellopay, Yapily and Revolut.

New whistleblower evidence reviewed by FinTelegram appears to show a Dutch-facing casino deposit flow moving from Kingdomcasino into openbanking.paysolo.net, where users are offered banks including Revolut, Rabobank, N26, SNS Bank and Wise. The payment page itself states that the user agrees to allow “Pellopay Finance LTD partners Yapily Connect” to initiate the payment. The evidence strengthens FinTelegram’s working hypothesis that anonymous gateways, open-banking providers, fiat/crypto bridge operators and Revolut’s Open Banking API may form a layered casino-payment corridor.