In the murky online brokerage world, the Octa (previously OctaFX) assessment by FinTelegram and Traders Union presents a starkly contrasting narrative. Is the offshore broker Octa a reputable and reliable platform for global traders or a cautionary tale for those navigating the complexities of regulatory compliance? The differing viewpoints of FinTelegram and Traders Union raise provocative questions about the right approach to evaluating online brokers.
FinTelegram’s Red Flag on Octa
FinTelegram’s investigation into Octa paints a picture of concern. The platform red-listed Octa in March 2023 following a warning from the Spanish CNMV (here) and the FCA license revocation. Despite being regulated by CySEC under Octa Markets Cyprus Ltd, Octa operates the overwhelming part of its business through an offshore entity in St. Lucia (previously St. Vincent & The Grenadines), attracting millions of visitors far beyond the regulatory oversight of the European Economic Area (EEA).
Read our latest Octa Review here on FinTelegram.
FinTelegram’s scrutiny reveals a troubling ease of access for EEA residents to Octa‘s offshore services, including pre-KYC deposits via crypto and high-leverage options that starkly contrast with the strict regulatory limits set by ESMA. Moreover, the lack of investor protection and recourse to the Financial Ombudsman in Cyprus, as highlighted by FinTelegram, amplifies the risk to investors, suggesting a disregard for regulatory norms in pursuit of broader market access.
The International Regulation
Octa has a system for circumventing regulatory requirements. Regulation costs money, a lot of money, and a lot of effort. That means less profit. India is currently, at least according to the latest Similarweb analyses, the market from which most website visitors come. The Indian regulator RBI has put Octa (formerly OctaFX) on its alert list. This means that Octa is not allowed to operate in India. The same applies to EEA jurisdictions such as Spain.
Currently, the RBI is advising against all international Forex brokers in India—this happens because we operate under international regulations, not only India’s. For our clients, this is an advantage—trading with a global broker gives access to the most beneficial conditions, the lowest spread, and the widest variety of instruments. However, we’ve already initiated the process of enhancing our position in India in cooperation with the local regulators.
Octa explanation of the Inda Situation on its website
On its website, Octa misinforms people about the Indian situation. It says that it doesn’t have to care about the regulator’s warning because it works with “international regulations.” Really? Interesting explanation, right? The do not have an “international regulation” in the first place. And, yes, Octa continues to serve the Indian traders despite the regulator’s warning. This is called premeditated breaking of the law.
Circumventing regulatory requirements has become much easier in the age of cyber finance with cryptocurrencies. Nevertheless, this is not a trivial offense, but a material breach of applicable financial laws. This is FinTelegram’s view.
Traders Union’s Endorsement
Conversely, Traders Union offers a more benign view of Octa in a recent article on Finance Feeds, emphasizing the broker’s dual operational structure: one regulated within the EU by CySEC and the other catering to a global audience from the offshore location St. Lucia. Highlighting OctaFX‘s focus on the Asia-Pacific region, the Traders Union acknowledges the regulatory challenges faced by the broker outside the EU but notes the high-reliability score attributed to Octa. This positive assessment is grounded in the broker’s adherence to CySEC regulations for EU traders, suggesting a compartmentalized approach to regulatory compliance.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK has revoked its license due to breaches of safety rules and misleading practices regarding CFD trading. Additionally, the broker operates with offshore regulations for EU non-residents, adding an extra layer of consideration for traders.
Traders Union about OctaFX on Finance Feeds
Traders Union is, therefore, fully aware of the regulatory warnings and material regulatory issues at OctaFX. In its further analysis, however, the are classified as “extra layer of consideration for traders” only. Seriosly now? While FinTelegram has placed the broker on the Red Compliance List due to the proven and persistent violation of regulatory requirements, Traders Union actually recommends Octa in its article, written by Oleg Tkachenko, allegedly an experienced analyst and risk manager.
A Provocative Dichotomy
This stark contrast in assessments raises critical questions about the lens through which online brokers should be evaluated. FinTelegram’s cautionary stance underscores the paramount importance of regulatory compliance and investor protection, casting a shadow over OctaFX‘s offshore operations. Meanwhile, Traders Union‘s more favorable review highlights the broker’s strategic regulatory adherence within the EU and its reputed reliability among a global clientele.
Traders Union is, therefore, aware of the regulatory warnings and problems at OctaFX. In the further analysis, however, only regulatory challenges are mentioned as if regulatory violations were only minor, negligible offenses. The word investor protection, or rather, lack of investor protection, does not appear in the analysis. FinTelegram, on the other hand, has placed the broker on the Red Compliance List due to the proven and persistent violation of regulatory requirements in EEA jurisdictions.
Perhaps the soft assessment of Traders Union also has something to do with their business model, primarily based on promoting brokers. This includes offshore brokers such as Octa, RoboForex, and Pocket Option.
Excellent Client Reviews
Traders obviously love Octa, if Trustpilot can be trusted (not always the case). There, the broker has a 4.5-star rating with an Excellent Trust Level with over 6,700 reviews. That is impressive. However, the fact is that in the absence of regulatory frameworks, business is much easier to do. The non-observance of regulatory framework conditions is a competitive advantage over regulated competitors.
The dichotomy between FinTelegram and Traders Union‘s perspectives on OctaFX serves as a provocative reminder of the complexities inherent in the global online brokerage industry. It challenges investors and traders to navigate a regulatory maze, balancing the lure of high leverage and easy access against the fundamental need for security and protection.
As the debate rages on, the question remains: Should the focus be on a broker’s regulatory compliance within specific jurisdictions, or is the broader picture of global operations and client satisfaction equally important? This debate illuminates the challenges of assessing online brokers and highlights the diverse priorities and risks traders face in a rapidly evolving financial landscape.
Share Information
If you have any information about the activities of offshore brokers, please let us know via our whistleblowing system, Whistle42.
